Thought that I should share the news article regarding issue with the rest of you.
I worked with one of the production companies mentioned in the article and was initially rather taken aback by the amount of items the company was sponsored from Braun Buffel, in exchange for product placements in the play, What the Butler Saw, which ran for approximately 2 weeks.
I am not quite sure whether this is happening in Australian theatres, maybe someone could enlighten on this point?
-- Clara
I think it is another creative and practical way of getting more funding for theatre productions. We are all living in a world of brands anyway, so why deny their existence at all. If we want to portray 'reality' in scripted productions, there is no reason why we don't invite brands in.
ReplyDeleteUsually in Singapore ( Where I'm from), theatre productions always need that 'healthy' relationship with their corporate sponsors. Most of the theatre productions in Singapore need that corporate $upport, on top of the government grant that they had been given but not may not be sufficient enough to, say, cover some of the meals/costume/props costs. Some of these companies also supports film making, concerts and even albums. Anyway even though we can't really escape ads whenever we go, doesn't mean we do not have the choice to reject them :).
I do agree with what you've said. Singapore's theatre scene is rather pathetic in terms of funding and is heavily reliant on corporate and individual sponsorships. What I find surprising is how they are slowly creeping into the performance itself in a more blatant manner.
ReplyDeleteBoth your comments are interesting in terms of how Auslander accounts for so-called mediatisation in the space of liveness. If advertising could be thought of as a highly mediatised activity (which some may dispute to begin with) then it seems that what is interesting about this news story is the way that a practice 'of' mediatisation has entered the so-called 'live'. ie Would we even know how to read product placement and its purposes if it hadn't happened in cinema and TV first?
ReplyDeleteWe would probably have realised the significance of product placement, albeit at a slower rate, if it was introduced into the theatre due to its inability to reach the masses simultaneously and constantly, unlike television. To me, this ties in with what Auslander claims in that theatre and media are constantly referring to each other for renewal and authority.
ReplyDelete